🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard females from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially return the legislation for further consideration if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in additional member states